Reform is facing criticism for what some perceive as sympathetic remarks towards Russian President Vladimir Putin regarding Ukraine’s potential NATO membership. Labour MP Calvin Bailey, a former RAF wing commander, accused Nigel Farage and his associates of echoing Kremlin-influenced viewpoints. This backlash follows Richard Tice, Farage’s deputy, suggesting that Ukrainian NATO accession should not provoke Russian President Putin.
Tice proposed that Kyiv should make concessions for peace, contrary to his party leader’s previous stance in February, where he emphasized the importance of Ukraine’s NATO inclusion. Bailey highlighted Reform’s apparent shift on Ukraine’s NATO membership, attributing it to Farage’s past admiration for Putin.
Bailey emphasized Ukraine’s inevitable path to NATO membership, refuting any Putin sympathizers. The recent criticism towards Farage culminated in a US Congressional hearing, where he was labeled a “Putin-supporting charlatan” by Democrat Jamie Raskin.
Farage’s previous remarks praising Putin’s strategic abilities were contrasted with Reform’s earlier support for Ukraine’s NATO integration as crucial for peace. However, Tice’s recent statements suggest a more pragmatic approach, advocating for a compromise with Kyiv to achieve a lasting resolution.
Tice proposed targeting frozen Russian assets worth £25 billion, speculating that seizing Putin’s wealth could influence his behavior positively. Meanwhile, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky reiterated his determination for NATO membership, emphasizing the alliance’s collective defense principle.
Tice questioned the necessity of Ukraine joining NATO if it hinders a potential settlement with Russia, prompting a reevaluation of diplomatic approaches. A Reform spokesperson reaffirmed the party’s commitment to Ukraine’s security and dismissed Labour’s accusations as unfounded smears.